Author: José Berdiñas Bonefua
Date: 16:48:26 05/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 1999 at 17:23:38, James Robertson wrote: >On May 02, 1999 at 05:07:20, pete wrote: > >><snip> >>> >>>Should the makers of these various Winboard engines start arguing that they can >>>hang (and in this case beat) the commericals and start charging $50 for their >>>engines, since they're better than Nimzo? Should I start analyzing my games with >>>various Winboard engines instead of Nimzo2000? >>> >>>Roger >> >><snip> >> >>I agree the best freeware programs are not much worse than the commercial ones. >> >>But the NIMZO case is special : actually there is a version nimzo2000a which >>plays just as good as the original Nimzo2000, which is a very strong program >>while the sold winboard engine just sucks ( for example varduz on ICC uses > > >Just SUCKS??? Then how come my program has but one draw after about 30 games?? > >James > >2000a >>). >> >>I think probably the author is planning to make an internet connection for the >>original program himself . What over reason is possible to offer something that >>is worse than your best ? Or maybe he wanted to fool millenium :=) >> >>Pete In Nimzo 2000 you can run the file Nimzo 98 upgrade paderborn !!! José
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.