Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Does it Really matter if Computers of GM At 40/2? A subjective Viewpoint

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:43:12 05/03/99

Go up one level in this thread


On May 03, 1999 at 03:20:33, odell hall wrote:
[snip]
>Come On Uri!
>
>  True, but you are completely missing the point I am trying to make.  A
>computer can play at the Grandmaster level at various time controls, whereas it
>may not play at that level at 40/2.  For instance Fritz5 just proved that at
>game/30 It can play at 2810 Level!. So for all practical purposes when you sit
>down to play fritz at game\30 you are facing a grandmaster strength opponent.
>at that particular time control.  A computer program then cannot be Im or Gm by
>playing Game\60, but it can certainly play at Grandmaster Strength at that time
>control!
Why do you want to call it a GM then?  Just call it a 'darned good fast chess
player.'  And I will also agree that if you play the games really fast then
computers will be better.

If the title has no meaning, then don't try to attach it.

Everyone knows that computers are the best in the world at blitz already.  If
that is what you enjoy, then you can know that you have at your command
something better than any human.  But at tournament time controls, we do not
have any proof yet.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.