Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 15:53:00 05/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On April 30, 1999 at 19:58:45, Alain Lyrette wrote: >Bottom line is that to this day nobody has proved that one kind of chess >programming(knowledge-base vs fast searchers)is superior to the other...and if i >can add my grain of salt i will say that although i have the utmost respect for >Ed(Rebel)and all his fantastic ideas(2010,GM match.his very good website)i don't >share with him the premise that you should differenciate a program from another >whether it plays against another program or against a human..playing incorrect >sacrifices to "scare" the humans or to get the game more interesting can be fun >but only that...fun.That being said...what an interesting tread!Keep it up >gang!Eh...i think my english is improving.... I do not know what is "knowledge based". To me it is obvious that a program can be a slow searcher and lack chess knowledge. But I think that a program can be a fast searcher and have a lot of chess knowledge, too.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.