Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: we need more than 9 plies to prove that black is losing .

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 16:09:23 05/03/99

Go up one level in this thread


On May 02, 1999 at 13:17:50, Francis Monkman wrote:
>
>On May 02, 1999 at 12:30:41, blass uri wrote:
>
>>Sorry, but the static evaluation of the position after 22.Ng5 is not a win for
>>white and you need to see some more plies to see that white is winning.
>>
>>9 plies+ right extensions is enough but programs do not know to do the right
>>extensions.
>
>The position at 22 Ng5 is Mate in 5, according to ChessBase. So maybe we should
>be talking about these 'right extensions'?
Mate in 5 is ten plies.  Maybe these 'right extensions' are one more ply. ;-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.