Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: hard test position for computer programs

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 05:32:55 05/05/99

Go up one level in this thread


On May 05, 1999 at 07:51:57, Micheal Cummings wrote:

>>>>r1b2rk1/pp2nppp/2n1p3/q1ppP1B1/3P2QP/P1P5/2P1NPP1/R3KB1R b KQ h3 0 1
>>>>
>>>>This position is from a game between Rebel8 and Saitek Sparc(1996)
>>>>
>>>>Saitek Sparc like other programs falled in a trap and played 10...Nxd4
>>>>
>>>>Can your  program avoid 10...Nxd4.
>>>
>>>I don't have them here at work (it wouldn't help, CM doesn't run in NT) but I
>>>guess the only programs "smelling" the danger can be Chessmaster and CStal. All
>>>others certainly have no evaluation functions for this longtime danger. (I tried
>>>Phalanx and WChess)
>>>This is an excellent example for the importance of king safety. The black loss
>>>is too far because black can't resist the temptation to give some checks which
>>>push the loss beyond the horizon.
>>>Any programmer confirming this?
>>
>>Chessmaster6000 cannot see the danger even some plies after Nd4
>>
>>Uri
>
>After 30 mins CM6K still likes Nd4, do not know if it likes it with more time
>though, All my programs only like Nd4. Shredder 2, and Rebel 10 all the same.

So I think no program will find this, the loss is too far.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.