Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Which is the limit between strategy and tactics? The human mind.

Author: Paulo Soares

Date: 17:13:50 05/05/99

Go up one level in this thread


On May 05, 1999 at 10:30:23, Harald Faber wrote:

>On May 05, 1999 at 05:43:22, Paulo Soares wrote:
>
>>We spoke a lot on: strategy, tactics, positional programs, tactical programs,
>>etc. I think that difference doesn't exist between strategy and tactics.  I
>>think too that chemistry and physics are the same tingh. It would  being crazy?
>>I believe that, as it is spoken in Brazil, " Of doctor and crazy we everybody
>>has a little " (this sentence is funny in the Portuguese language, because the
>>rhyme exists). Leaving the madness sideways (or continuing with it), I believe
>>that to separate a subject to be studied by parts, only makes sense in view of
>>the limitation of the human mind, that needs references for best to understand
>>the things. I am not writing that with the purpose of ending with our
>>references, because we needed them, after all we have a limited mind. The one
>>that we needed to understand is that they are just references, and not absolute
>>things, that is to say, points exists in that won't get to distinguish among
>>physics and chemistry, strategy and tactics, etc, etc, etc.
>>Chess Tiger is known as a tactical program, I found very interesting and funny
>>this sentence of Christophe Theron, that expresses well that I think: "Chess
>>Tiger is a knowledge based program. The purpose of anything I put in it is
>>to understand chess better and to win more games. That's why it's knowledge
>>based."
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Paulo Soares, from Brazil
>
>Tactics and strategy go hand in hand. A tactical solution is not possible
>without a sound position.
>What we can say definitely is that in open positions tactics is more important
>and more "available" than in closed positions where strategy is more important.

Harald, I think that exists the good and the bad move(s), only
that. I agree that strategy, as we know it, aid very to
understand a closed position, but only because the human mind
does not have the capacity of analyse with more depth a position of
this type. That is valid also for the opened, semi-closed,
etc. positions.

Regards,
Paulo Soares



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.