Author: James Robertson
Date: 21:05:09 05/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 1999 at 23:39:11, Charles L. Williams wrote: >On May 05, 1999 at 18:15:28, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On May 05, 1999 at 13:26:43, jose hernandez wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>For example Are a knowledge program like Rebel or Hiarcs better in blitz games >>>than a Fastest programs like Fritz or Junior ? >>> >>>or a Knowledge program is better in long controls than a fastest programs ? >>> >>>What do you think? >> >>suppose Ed finds an idea that makes Rebel >>5 times faster with the same evaluation function. >> >>Do you continue to call Rebel a knowledge program? >> >>If you comtinue to call Rebel a knowledge program then your definition is not >>based on the fact that Rebel is searching less nodes per second and I want to >>know your definition for knowledge programs. >> >>Uri > > >I'd think that a true knowledge-based program wouldn't have a search. >Otherwise, it's a search-based program and the debate becomes how much chess >knowledge is in the evaluation. > > >Chuck That doesn't quite work either, because the search itself is intrinsically knowledge. :) James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.