Author: José Carlos
Date: 09:50:32 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 1999 at 12:08:29, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On May 06, 1999 at 11:55:52, José Carlos wrote: > >>On May 05, 1999 at 13:47:07, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >> >>>On May 05, 1999 at 13:26:43, jose hernandez wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>For example Are a knowledge program like Rebel or Hiarcs better in blitz games >>>>than a Fastest programs like Fritz or Junior ? >>>> >>>>or a Knowledge program is better in long controls than a fastest programs ? >>>> >>>>What do you think? >>> >>> I think that a program can have lots of knowledge and be a fast searcher. It >>>seems obvious that a program can lack knowledge and be a slow searcher too. >> >> Hey, that's my program!!. So what do you call my program >>little-knowledge-based or slow-searcher? :) >> > > I would call it a promising program in an early stage of development (: > >>> I do not see a clear distinction between 'fast' and 'knowledge', to me those >>>terms are not conflictive with each other. In fact, I think that speed gives >>>knowledge and knowledge gives speed, in some sense. >>> The longer the time control, the better search algorithm will prevail. I do not >>>think it has to do with speed or knowledge. >> >> The fact is that the AI definition for a knowledge-based program (in general, >>not particularly chess) is quite different from the definitions (yes, in plural) >>most people is using here. I think it's not important at the moment what is the >>AI definition, but the most important is what any who wants to take part in this >>discussion wants to say when he speak of knowledge-based program. >> Perhaps, if people start their post with something similar to a personal >>definition of the terms, we all could understand better what he wants to say. >> > > I carefully avoid the term 'knowledge based', as I really do not know what it >means. It seems like a hot potato these days. > But I say 'knowledge program' when I mean a program that has lots of chess >knowledge (other types of knowledge do not seem relevant in this context). This >chess knowldege can be almost everywhere, not only in the evaluation function. > >> José C. > > Oye, tocayo, ¿de dónde eres? Supongo que hablas castellano. Yo soy mexicano, de >Ensenada, y actualmente vivo en Guanajuato. >José. Soy español, de Murcia. Entiendo tu punto de vista sobre la cantidad de "conocimiento" en los programas de ajedrez, aunque no está de más clarificarlo, pues los términos empiezan a resultar confusos. In english: I'm spanish, from Murcia. I understand your point of view about knowledge in chess programs, but it is good to clarify it, cause terms begin to result somewhat confusing. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.