Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 10:34:07 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 1999 at 01:52:14, jose hernandez wrote: > >[Event K6-2 450] >[Site ?? ] >[Date " 1999.05.03] >[White : Hiarcs6.1 ] >[Black : Fritz5.00 ] >[Result : 1 - 0 ] > > >1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. g3 Nf6 4. Bg2 dxc4 5. Qa4+ Nbd7 6. Qxc4 a6 7.Qc2 c5 > >8. Nf3 Be7 9. 0-0 0-0 10. Nc3 cxd4 11. Nxd4 Bc5 I like 11... e5, getting hold on the center, and freeing the h3-c8 diagonal for the white-squared bishop. >12. Nb3 Ba7 13. Bd2 Qe7 > >14. Rad1 h6 There is no need to prevent Bg5, as the bishop can be rejected later (note that the g3 pawn does not allow the white bishop to eventually retreat to h4). I prefer Rd8 at once, or some other sound positional move. >15. Na5! Rb8 Here I prefer 15...Nb6, which leaves the bishop in a7 defended by the rook. With Rb8 the undefended bishop later becomes very vulnerable. >16.a3 Rd8 17. Na4! Ng4 17... Nd5, heading for the center, looks better. The knight does nothing useful in g4, and only asks for trouble. >18. Bb4 Qf6 19. e3 Qe5 > >20. Nc4 Qg5 21. h4 Qf6 22. Nd6 Nge5 23. Qc7 Rf8 24. Rc1! Qg6 25. b3 Ra8 > >26. Rc3 Qh5 27. Nxc8 Rfxc8, 28. Qxb7 Rcb8 29. Qc7 Rbc8 30. Qxc8 > > 1 - 0 > > >This is a good game of Hiarcs6 again Fritz5, but i dont understand where Fritz5 >made a mistake. Or was a bad openning for Fritz ? > >Please put your opinion about this game. I want to Know. >This game is absoulutely correct. I write this very slowly. Please look the game >and write your opinion I wrote my human (non-computer) comments, and I am not a very strong player. Further human and computer analysis are required; but I hope you can begin your investigation with the moves that seem weak to me. Up to which move did the programs stay in their book? To me, it seems that black is only slightly behind after the opening, the book should not be blamed for the loss.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.