Author: Charles L. Williams
Date: 12:00:26 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 1999 at 00:05:09, James Robertson wrote: >On May 05, 1999 at 23:39:11, Charles L. Williams wrote: > >>On May 05, 1999 at 18:15:28, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On May 05, 1999 at 13:26:43, jose hernandez wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>For example Are a knowledge program like Rebel or Hiarcs better in blitz games >>>>than a Fastest programs like Fritz or Junior ? >>>> >>>>or a Knowledge program is better in long controls than a fastest programs ? >>>> >>>>What do you think? >>> >>>suppose Ed finds an idea that makes Rebel >>>5 times faster with the same evaluation function. >>> >>>Do you continue to call Rebel a knowledge program? >>> >>>If you comtinue to call Rebel a knowledge program then your definition is not >>>based on the fact that Rebel is searching less nodes per second and I want to >>>know your definition for knowledge programs. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>I'd think that a true knowledge-based program wouldn't have a search. >>Otherwise, it's a search-based program and the debate becomes how much chess >>knowledge is in the evaluation. >> >> >>Chuck > >That doesn't quite work either, because the search itself is intrinsically >knowledge. :) > >James I see your point, so let me try another one. Maybe programmers claim their programs are "knowledge-based" when they can't get as many nps as the next guy. :) Chuck
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.