Author: jonathon smith
Date: 15:00:28 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 1999 at 17:53:17, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On May 06, 1999 at 17:18:47, jonathon smith wrote: > >>On May 06, 1999 at 17:12:18, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>> >>>On May 06, 1999 at 15:41:11, Greg Lazarou wrote: >>> >>>>Yeap, >>>> >>>>a) Somebody puts up a thread on starting a campaign to get Bob back here - great >>>>idea I think! >>>>b) A "moderator" takes upon himself to explain how he will not "beg" for Bob to >>>>come back and provides other excuses and justifications for past actions. >>>>c) Bob comes back to explain his position and gets further attacked by the >>>>"moderator" >>>>d) Another moderator jumps in and erases the whole thread and any subsequent >>>>mention to it >>>>e) I'm sure the next step is to erase this whole thread too >>>> >>>>Great "job" guys!!! With Bob and Ed leaving this is not going to be the same... >>>>I'd think the moderator's job would have been to beg these types of people to >>>>not give up on this place. >>>> >>>>Greg >>> >>>They may start erasing entire people soon. >>> >>>bruce >> >>You guys started the 'erasing'. >> >>Chris Whittington > >I don't feel at all bad about any of the cases where I asked for a post to be >deleted, or asked for a member to be banned. I did the best I could with that >job and I don't have anything to be embarassed about. > >This place is not anarchic, it's something that is built into its charter, and >that's fine with me. > >The situation now is nuts. What has happened, I believe, is that since this >current group was elected, Steve added a feature that allows any moderator to >delete any post. > >Previously we had to ask Steve, which inconvenienced him, or inconvenienced Tim, >or both. There were periods, like at night, where we could do nothing, because >nobody was awake to do the deleting. > >This was inconvenient, stressful, and slow, but it also served as a built-in >check. You couldn't just delete something and fail to tell anyone. At least >one other person knew about it, and since there is no sensible reason not to CC >the other moderators, typically we all knew about it, and if there was a >problem, someone could say something. > >The situation now is simply ghastly. It's the difference between being handled >according to a system with at least some checks built into it, and being dragged >off to the gulag at three in the morning. > >bruce > >PS: The first guy to be banned here was banned at your insistence, so I don't >know what you mean by "you guys". Right. Except I changed my mind, and told you it would continue with eating its own children. As all revolutions always do. The revolutionaries lack wisdom. They're always too young and inexperienced. You got credit for baling out earlier, and Matthias for baling out at the very start. One by one everybody pulled out, or got pushed. Finito.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.