Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 15:11:46 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 1999 at 17:52:04, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On May 06, 1999 at 16:36:45, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>We moderate the moderators, every six months.
>
>so why are so many leaving IF IT WORKS ?
Perhaps you have answered your own question. Certainly, things are looking
somewhat broken at this point. Mind you, r.g.c.c. is even more broken, but I
will not argue that no improvement is possible. So, let's be constructive.
What should change for the system to work better?
I will start with some possibilities:
1. Before a post removal can take place, there must be agreement by two
moderators, or one moderator plus someone from ICD. This may be a good balance
between "timely post removal" and "unnecessary post removal".
2. Possibly some mechanism to view deleted posts? But this kind of defeats
the purpose of deleting them, so I don't know how good that would be.
3. Remove posts, not people (except at their own request). It would be
necessary to have some sort of "moderator-must-approve-this-post" mechanism to
avoid abuse of the kind seen in the past, though.
>>Do you have any predictions for Paderborn?
>
>
>Hiarcs, Rebel or Tiger.
>One of the 3.
>
>
>>Dave
Hmm. All good choices! I am thinking perhaps Ernst Heinz and the DarkThought
team will pull it off. But of course, I don't really know, that is why we hold
the competition!
Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.