Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 16:43:15 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 1999 at 19:02:29, Mark Young wrote:
>On May 05, 1999 at 16:38:35, Pat King wrote:
>
>>On May 05, 1999 at 13:26:43, jose hernandez wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>For example Are a knowledge program like Rebel or Hiarcs better in blitz games
>>>than a Fastest programs like Fritz or Junior ?
>>>
>>>or a Knowledge program is better in long controls than a fastest programs ?
>>>
>>>What do you think?
>>I have heard it said that the Knowledge programs tend to fare better at the
>>faster time controls, because the Speed type programs don't have time to get
>>deep enough.
>
>I don't think you can break it down knowledge vs speed. I have played both
>Hiarcs7 (knowledge based) and Fritz 5.32 (fast searcher).
I don't understand how you think you are allowed to say that Hiarcs is knowledge
based and Fritz is not.
Such reasoning is completely missing the point. Where does this legend comes
from?
Christophe
>Both are very strong
>at blitz and are 1 & 2 at blitz chess in my testing. Hiarcs7 was able to edge
>out Fritz 5 at blitz chess in my testing by only 20 points in about 100 games
>played each vs other players on fics, computer and human. Neither program lost
>to any human player, and Hiarcs7 got the edge by playing slightly better against
>other computer programs like crafty.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.