Author: vitor
Date: 23:25:45 05/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 1999 at 21:27:49, Roger D Davis wrote: >It would be nice to solve the moderation problem, because this is the only place >on the web where computer chess can be discussed now that RGCC is dead. I have >two ideas (and welcome others): > >1) Consensual moderation. Here, there are no moderators...we all moderate the >group together. How? Some slick programmer creates a way to attach a counter to >each post. Any reader can cast a vote (only once) to increment the >counter...when the counter reaches some threshold value (we might to experiment >on that), it is automatically removed by the system. If a post is removed, >there's no one to blame...it's all anonymous and driven by the community. > >2) Have an alternate "open" area inside CCC where anyone can post about >anything. Yep, this basically creates an RGCC inside CCC, but it gives those >whose messages have been censored a feeling of immunity from moderation. If you >dont want to read the unmoderated forum, you don't have to. If you don't want to >post there, you don't have to. > >Any other ideas? We should brainstorm...this is much valuable a forum to just >let it die. There really isn't anywhere else to go. > >Roger moderator wrote: Do you recall that we decided (all the moderators) that discussions about moderation were fine, but not discussions about a decision to delete a message? its hard to discuss problems of moderation without being allowed to cite specific evidence. on the other hand, moderation discussions are not computer chess related so they should be deleted. hmm maybe a compromise could be to send all deleted messages (non cc related) to another forum. when a mod makes a deletion, we can all see and judge the situation for ourselves. a wise man once said, "Cant we all just get along?"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.