Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 07:08:38 05/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 1999 at 05:07:38, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On May 07, 1999 at 04:04:44, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On May 06, 1999 at 17:36:48, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>> >>>On May 06, 1999 at 17:28:48, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>> >>>>On May 06, 1999 at 17:08:01, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>On May 06, 1999 at 15:28:14, Mike Castañuela wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 06, 1999 at 13:51:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>To Prof. Hyatt and Mr. Schroeder: >>>>>> >>>>>>Please reconsider your decision. Sometimes, >>>>>>tough skin is necessary, but firstly, you both are >>>>>>part of the 'creme', fundamental part to exists >>>>>>this type of fourms. >>>>>> >>>>>>In effect, the moderators deleted two fulls thread >>>>>>without apparent cause. This is sad. >>>>>> >>>>>>If both you persist in it, good, in 1-2 months, >>>>>>with new moderators, we will waitng your return. >>>>> >>>>>I am leaving until those guys are gone as well, although my post that said so >>>>>was deleted. >>>>> >>>>>bruce >>>> >>>>Does the deletion mechanism track who does the deletion? >>>> >>>>I will assume that your post was reasonable, my past experience being that you >>>>are a reasonable poster. :) >>>> >>>>Dave >>> >>>I re-posted it. >>> >>>bruce >> >>I protest against the deletion of 2 posts of mine which did not include personal >>attacks at all; the 1st of these had been just a modest attempt of mediation >>between Mr. Hayatt and the moderators though also involving some critics against >>one of the moderator's way to treat this issue. >> >>This is not the way I expect moderators to act. >> >>Uli > >I read your first post. It was a call for reconcilliation. Your second post >expressed a similar viewpoint. > >I don't understand why these posts are against the charter. > >bruce Will said that the entire thread was removed. In this case I don't think he decided that each individual post was "against the charter", as you put it. The general direction of the thread seems to be what is being judged. I have had posts in threads that were removed before. It has never bothered me, or I would have emailed the moderators about it. Typically my message would not make any sense out of the context in which it was written, so it would be pointless for it to stick around. I'd imagine that if Uli reposted his message, it wouldn't get deleted, but I'm not sure how much or little sense it would make without having Harald's message around. Lots, for all I know. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.