Author: KarinsDad
Date: 13:30:08 05/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 07, 1999 at 15:49:55, Dann Corbit wrote: >Shamelessly purloined from one of Bruce's messages: > >"There is no need for more process baggage to be dumped on the moderators. It >is enough to remind them that: > >1) They should behave with some sensitivity toward those who elected them. >2) Actions such as post deletion be accompanied by appropriate email. >3) They should attempt to achieve some concensus within their own group." > >I would like to add that if some tools could be built to assist them, it would >make their horrible, thankless job much easier. For instance, to delete a >message, a form would open. It would contain the text of the message with the >email address of the offender and the other CCC moderators. There would be a >standard list of checkboxes as to why the message was bounced >(profanity/personal attack/whatever) and, if none of those applied a typing area >labelled "other". > >Then the other moderators and the person getting the boot would all know what is >going on, and the post would not be dropped until at least two out of three >agreed to do so (my opinion). > >Other ideas? Yeah, I liked mine (posted earlier). Same advantages. No automation needed. No "stuffing of the ballot box" type of things due to some people have 50 accounts. Way less of a hassle. JMO. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.