Author: Ricardo Sant Ana
Date: 13:05:34 05/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 1999 at 14:47:32, Mark Young wrote: >On May 09, 1999 at 14:32:46, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On May 09, 1999 at 12:01:22, jose hernandez wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>Why SSdf gives to Fritz5.32 better openings again Hiarcs7 ????? >No, the Hiarcs7 rating can not be trusted, other then to say it is most likely >better then what SSDF has listed(how much better????). The question is did this >bug cause other losses or draws for Hiarcs7 and how many. You pointed out other >bad moves played by Hiarcs7 in the endgame that other programs don't make. I >wonder if this was Hiarcs7 misevaluation or maybe related to this bug. >> >>Uri So, what about the seletive search list, where Hiarcs 7 seems to be number ONE. By the way, I have a simple experiment for people who have fritz5. Try to play not trying to win ! I really believe you are able to even draw against Fritz5.32. This week, I will play myself against F5.32 a 2 hours each game. So, I will post the result here. I am sure F5.32 was able to beat Polgar, but what if an amateur play against it ? Thanks Ricardo Sant´Ana
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.