Author: Will Singleton
Date: 19:32:22 05/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 1999 at 19:32:37, Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com) wrote: >Here's my data: > >HIARCS 7 - with 64Mb Hash (Mac) or 63Mb Hash (PC) > >Machine CPU MHz CPU Nodes/second nps/MHz Configuration >=================================================================== >Mac Yosemite 400 MHz 750 53,413 nps 133.5 Sys 8.5.1, 128Mb RAM, G3 >Mac Yosemite 350 MHz 750 47,615 nps 136.0 Sys 8.5.1, 128Mb RAM, G3 >Mac PowerBook 300 MHz 750 40,062 nps 133.5 Sys 8.5, 192Mb RAM, G3 >Mac ??? 310 MHz 750 38,929 nps 125.6 Sys 8.1, accel. card? >Pent II /400 400 MHz PII 38,347 nps 95.9 Win 98 "safe mode" (DOS) >AMD K6/350 350 MHz K6 35,052 nps 100.1 Win 95, -x 63 Mb hash >Mac iMac 233 MHz 750 30,942 nps 132.8 Sys 8.5.1, 96Mb RAM >Mac 7300/180 180 MHz 604e 20,567 nps 114.3 Sys 7.5.5, 80Mb RAM >Pentium MMX 200 MHz P5? 18,910 nps 94.5 SSDF test machine, 64Mb RAM >Mac 6100/ 66 66 MHz 601 4,862 nps 73.7 Sys 7.5 , 72Mb RAM > >Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com) >http://directory.mozilla.org/Games/Board_Games/Chess/Software/Macintosh/ I appreciate your data. This is all geared to Hiarcs, however. Do you have relevant integer performance data that would allow generic comparisons between the motorola chip and intel's? Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.