Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 16:21:26 05/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 1999 at 14:44:55, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On May 08, 1999 at 06:04:45, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On May 08, 1999 at 03:02:25, Charles Unruh wrote: >> >>> It seems that in this chess, the players wont ever be confronted with any >>>surprise moves any more, after all they have 3 engines, one of them will be >>>considering the move actually played. Thus it seems no move will be wholly the >>>GM's(per say). Can we expect anything other than draws this time around? >> >>Yes, computers are not close to be perfect and the players can be confronted >>with surprises. >>There are many positions when programs cannot find the right move even in >>tactics(see the nolot test,see shirov's move Bh3) >> >>There are many wins in computer-computer games so it is clear that computers do >>many mistakes. >> >>Uri > >Was ...Be4 not as good as ...Bh3? > >Dave I assume you refer to the famous game Topalov-Shirov. From the practical point of view (which I always like to take), Shirov's Bh3 is a lot better than Be4. If Be4 also wins (it seems so), then from the theoretical point of view they are equally good. José.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.