Author: David Blackman
Date: 22:47:14 05/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 1999 at 01:01:00, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>class State {
>
>public:
> // stuff
>
>protected:
> // more stuff
>
> int init_color[64] = {
> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
> 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6,
> 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6,
> 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6,
> 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6,
> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
> };
>};
>Dave
Probably for your purposes it should be static. I think that makes it easier to
compile without errors too. Also here, in the class definition it should just be
static int init_color[64];
Put the initialiser somehere else, outside the class definition. Should be
something like
static int State::init_color[64] = {
1,1,1,1,1,1,1, /* more numbers */ };
At least i hope this is it. I didn't actually test this. const is optional here,
but does seem sensible.
I think the reason for the errors you got has something to do with OO
philosophy. You aren't supposed to initialise object fields in the class
definition. You're supposed to do it in the constructor. But class fields (ie.
statics) should be initialised just once in the program, so you can get away
with it for statics.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.