Author: Francis Monkman
Date: 14:33:38 05/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 1999 at 16:54:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >Just looking at what you posted, this appears to be a case of a program >coming up with a random move for the wrong reason. IE the eval of +.23 is >not exactly 'winning'. And while the moves from CSTal/Crafty might not win >either, what makes Rad1 a winner? And if it does, do you _really_ want a >program that will play such a move without having a clue why it is playing >it? Sorry Bob, but this is specious. LGG obviously has a good 'clue' as to the winning line. > >My opinion is that there are probably several reasonable moves here, none are >outright winning or losing... You'll appreciate I did some extensive analysis on this, but I'll pass it on to those better qualified than I, as you insist. (If anyone still has any doubts about the last one I posted, it was deemed an outright winner by two top GMs.) Francis
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.