Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ELO Rating of DB jr. @120M NPS ??? (look out Garry K)

Author: blass uri

Date: 21:29:48 05/14/99

Go up one level in this thread



On May 14, 1999 at 16:58:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On May 14, 1999 at 11:07:36, José Carlos wrote:
>
>>On May 14, 1999 at 05:24:20, Peter Hegger wrote:
>>
>>>Hello
>>>Let's say that today's best programs, Fritz, CM6000, junior etc.. are playing at
>>>the 2450 level at 40/2 when they've got hardware capable of knocking off .5M
>>>nps. I don't think this is too outlandish an assumption.
>>>If you double this speed 8 times over you arrive at 128M nps. This is in the
>>>same ballpark as this new proposed screamer of Hsu's which it is estimated will
>>>knock off 120M nps on a multi-processor platform.
>>>I've seen in other threads that doubling speed will increase performance
>>>anywhere from 30-70 points per doubling. For argument's sake and to split the
>>>difference I'll assume that 50 is likely pretty close. Using 2450 as the base
>>>this would translate into an elo of 2850 give or take a bit.
>>>Is it really possible that a machine which is stronger (marginally) rating wise
>>>than the world champion is right around the corner. Or am I missing something
>>>here in making this estimate?
>>>In any event I'd love to see Kasparov tackle this baby in a 40/2 24 game match.
>>>Bets anyone? :)
>>>Regards
>>>Peter
>>
>>
>>  The increment of peroformance doubling speed is more little as speed
>>increases. Doubling speed allows, usually, to go one ply deeper. So it's very
>>different to go from ply 7 to ply 8 than to go from ply 50 to ply 51, isn't it?
>>
>>  José C.
>
>
>You need to read the ICCA Journal.  There is lots of evidence (now) that
>going deeper does indeed lead to better play.7 to 8 is clearly going to do
>more than going from 50 to 51.  But 7 to 8 might not be any better than
>going from 14 to 15 or even 19 to 20, based on experiments both I and Ernst
>did.  Programs _still_ find better moves at deeper depths, even when the
>depth is increased from 14 to 15 or 15 to 16.

I know that programs change their mind from depth 14 to depth 15 the question is
if it changes the result of the game.

I think that from going from depth 7 to 8 there is a bigger chance to change the
result of the game then in going from depth 14 to 15.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.