Author: Michael Ginat
Date: 09:52:20 05/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 1999 at 05:25:29, Andreas Schwartmann wrote: >On May 15, 1999 at 01:03:46, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On May 14, 1999 at 23:35:23, Michael Ginat wrote: >> >>>On May 14, 1999 at 14:31:57, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>On May 14, 1999 at 11:03:18, Michael Ginat wrote: >>>> >>>>>Does this mean the Fritz engine has not really improved that much since version >>>>>4 ? >>>> >>>>r1b2rk1/5p1p/pbqppP2/1p2n2Q/4P3/2NBB3/PPP4P/R4RK1 w - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>Fritz5.32 played 18.Qxh7+ and lost against Fritz4 >>>> >>>>Uri >>>So is there a logical explanation for this blunder? >>>Michael >> >>I only saw that Fritz5.32 showed a mate evaluation when it played Qxh7+ >>I do not understand the reason for it. >>Uri > > >I also could not understand this blunder when it actually happened. Chessbase >told me it was a bug. I chose not to replay this game because this would not be >fair to the other engines involved. If a program loses on time or because of a >bug, it is a loss just as well. In a human/human match it is the same: No game >would ever be replayed just because the loser says "Oh, I lost that game because >I made this blunder just because I was tired!". A loss is a loss. > >Andreas It looks like chess programs are "human" after all :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.