Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 3 trouble-maker positions [discussed previously] Expert opinions needed

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 19:25:19 05/18/99

Go up one level in this thread


If there is any sort of logical reason for the choice other than:
"I will stop as soon as move 'x' looks best regardless of evaluation and time
remaining" I would accept it as a valid choice.  For instance, it might use a
win/loss/draw statistic from a database or it might use an actual positional
calculation of some sort to arrive at a sensible move.  These are valid reasons
for picking a move.  The way that H7 picks a move when you ask it to hunt for a
best move is bad for my purposes.  I need a valid pv so that I could actually
perform the needed sequence if called upon to do so.  This is especially true
since at least 25% of test suite answers are just plain wrong and I want to find
the right answer (if such exists and can be found).

If you just want to "score the epd suite" as quickly as possible, then the
method H7 has chosen is optimal.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.