Author: blass uri
Date: 00:43:12 05/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 1999 at 02:57:40, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On May 19, 1999 at 02:07:28, blass uri wrote: > >>There is an assumption that the best moves are Qd2,Be3,d5. >> >>Is there an evidence for these assumption? >> >>can someone suggests a tree that proves to programs (not Hiarcs7,Junior5) that >>Qd2 Be3 d5 are the best moves? >> >>Uri > >In these cases, the evidence is probably that human GMs have been playing those >moves for a long time. Computers are strong enough that this evidence is weaker >than it used to be. If computers are strong then the fact that some programs cannot find these moves is an evidence that these moves may be not correct. > I think many of the novelties discovered today are >discovered by software programs. I believe that computers also do many bad moves that humans do not do in the opening(If they have not an opening book) and if you take the cases that computers suggest move that is not in the theory then in most of the cases it is worse move and not a better move. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.