Author: blass uri
Date: 08:19:52 05/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 1999 at 08:05:28, Mark Young wrote: >So what you are saying is the program has to see it tacticly, or it does not >count. Programs have other aspects to them then just there search, and I see >nothing wrong with a program finding the correct move by seeing the other line >get killed, instead of seeing this one move wins. I see nothing wrong with finding the correct move but I am not sure if the moves are really correct. For example what is wrong with exf4 in the 3th position instead of d5 Junior5.4 suggests exf4 e5 Ng8 and I do not see the way that white can win. I read that hiarcs7 has in its book after 1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.f4 exf4 4.e5 Ng8 5.Nf3 the move 5...d6 but I do not see what is wrong with d5(Junior5.4's move). I want to see a line that convince programs that white has advantage after 3...exf4 but I know no line. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.