Author: blass uri
Date: 16:10:16 05/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 1999 at 15:50:34, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 19, 1999 at 15:27:53, Paulo Soares wrote: >[snip] >>I think that 1....Kf6 is too a winning move. >Crafty (with tablebase) found a draw. I suspect that you can only win with a >blunder. >8/6k1/4P3/1b1n1P2/6PK/8/p7/4R3 b - - acd 15; acn 134270624; acs 1002; ce 0; pv >Kf6 Ra1 Nb4 Kg3 Be2 Kh4 Bc4 Kg3 Be2; 1)I think that crafty over evaluate the passed pawns in this case. Junior find a clear advantage for black with Ne3 It won a game in engine-engine games against crafty16.6 without tablebases and crafty understood only after some moves that it is going to lose. I believe that tablebases cannot help because the relevant KBN vs KP is too deep for crafty The idea is to play Nc2 and a1Q and you need also to play the moves Kf7 if crafty plays e7 and Bc4 if crafty plays Ra1 The question is what is the evaluation of crafty in the KBN vs KPPP after playing this idea against crafty. I remeber that crafty found that the KBN vs KPPP is better for the KBN 2) Kf6 may be also enough to win(Junior see an advantage for black after giving it the position after Kf6 with the line Kh5 Be2 with 0.75 pawn advantge for black) if white plays Ra1(crafty's suggestion in the pv) then Junior evaluates Bc4 as good for black with 1.04 pawns advantage. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.