Author: Mark Young
Date: 16:35:40 05/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 1999 at 11:19:52, blass uri wrote: > >On May 19, 1999 at 08:05:28, Mark Young wrote: > > >>So what you are saying is the program has to see it tacticly, or it does not >>count. Programs have other aspects to them then just there search, and I see >>nothing wrong with a program finding the correct move by seeing the other line >>get killed, instead of seeing this one move wins. > >I see nothing wrong with finding the correct move but I am not sure if the moves >are really correct. I too agree with this point, and to many positions are just wrong or you have to take on faith that the BM is best, without any proof that the BM is best. > >For example what is wrong with exf4 in the 3th position instead of d5 >Junior5.4 suggests exf4 e5 Ng8 and I do not see the way that white can win. >I read that hiarcs7 has in its book after 1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.f4 exf4 4.e5 Ng8 >5.Nf3 the move 5...d6 but I do not see what is wrong with d5(Junior5.4's move). > >I want to see a line that convince programs that white has advantage after >3...exf4 but I know no line. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.