Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 22:07:04 05/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 1999 at 23:00:44, Will Singleton wrote: >On May 21, 1999 at 18:46:19, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On May 21, 1999 at 18:18:27, Will Singleton wrote: >> >>>On May 21, 1999 at 14:06:06, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>Here is the crafty result: >>>>1QQQ1QQQ/Q2q4/5r2/5k2/7K/q5Q1/qQ5R/bqqqqq1q w - - acd 4; acn 79517751; acs 579; >>>>ce 32766; pv Qhh7#; >>>>QQQq1QQQ/1Q4Q1/2q1q1q1/3k4/5KQ1/8/8/qq1q2qq w - - acd 4; acn 17119430; acs 110; >>>>ce 32766; pv Qcxc6#; >>>> >>>>Any program that can even get the disambiguation right should get bonus points. >>>>;-) >>> >>>For Amateur: >>> >>>14 queens -- >>> >>> 2 -3864 91.05 2632251 28860 >>> 3 9993 94.08 2712005 28800 Bxf1 Qxf1 Qxh2 Bxh2 Qxh2 >>> 3 9995 95.03 2739358 28800 Qxh2 Bxh2 Qxh2 >>> >>>18 queens -- >>> >>> 2 9997 67.02 2866399 42720 Qh7 >>> >>>18 queens -- >>> >>> 2 9997 8.01 361547 45060 Qxc6 >>> >>>I don't know why crafty uses more nodes than I. Maybe I'm ignoring some pieces. >>>:) And I don't print the disambiguation, though I can read it. Improves the >>>test suite results. >>> >>>Will >> >>In the days of adjournments, when somebody sealed an illegal move by failing to >>disambiguate it, they forfeited the game. I suggest we apply the same rule to >>test suites. :-) >> >>Dave > >Fine. I'll remember that if I ever publish my test suite results. :) > >Will What was that? Were you planning to fudge your test suite results? :) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.