Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 09:42:15 05/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
>Posted by Micheal Cummings on May 23, 1999 at 08:25:20: > >Ed > >Looking at this game and how your engine plays, do you think that maybe you >should change the format, to maybe a series of shorter games. Like 30 minutes a >side. That way within two hours you can get two games. I think that (especially) after the Anand-Rebel event people are only interested in tournament games. Even Kasparov lately more or less agreed that computers are equal to the top on 30 minutes games or lower. >I suppose I am just a bit dissapointed that Rebel lost. But at faster time >controls and with a GM under more time pressure maybe it might be more >interesting. It's my goal to compete on the highest level. 30 minutes games apparently are no challenge anymore, so better move on. This time beard the lion in his den, that is tournament time control, the area the human still is superior. >Also do you think future games played in the current format hold any hope for >Rebel to win. Maybe better hardware next time ? It was not the hardware that killed Rebel in this game but the thing underestimated a king attack and preferred a to eat a pawn in return, a wrong decision so software... Ed Schroder >regards > >Micheal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.