Author: Mark Young
Date: 19:13:22 05/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 1999 at 21:57:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 23, 1999 at 18:51:10, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>The answer is as simple as can be why Bxb4 in the first place what about >>development This bischop wasn,t doing anything there so why take it? if the >>program would like to do something about that bischop he could remove it later >>on with a3 so after bischop takes d2 the knight comes in the game with the >>winning of tempo > > >If you study the position long enough, you will begin to appreciate the >details of why Rohde's Nb4 move was really clever. There are several >long-range reasons why the knight needs to be removed immediately. Before I hear anymore about how clever GM Rohde's was in this game and how GM Rohde's said this is a won position on move 20. I want to see some winning lines showing this. All I have been able to find and other have shown is why the move 26. f4 is losing. Two key move need to be explained, why 23. Rxb4!? in not winning for Rebel 10.5, and if not how does GM Rohdes win after the move 26. Bg2!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.