Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 22:42:22 05/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 23, 1999 at 19:08:45, Michael Ginat wrote: >>>00:00:47 10.01 -0.12 Bd5-g2 Qe2-c2 Qc1-f1 Bh3xg2 Kg1xg2 b4-b3 Rb5-b6 >>>00:01:13 11.00 -0.01 Bd5-g2 Qe2-c2 Qc1-f1 Bh3xg2 Kg1xg2 Qc2xb2 Rb5-d5 >>>00:02:28 12.00 -0.04 Bd5-g2 Qe2-c2 Qc1-f1 Bh3xg2 Kg1xg2 Qc2xb2 Rb5xb7 >>>00:06:50 13.00 -0.07 Bd5-g2 Qe2-c2 Qc1-e1 Qc2xc4 Bg2-f1 Bh3xf1 Rb5xb4 >>> >>>I guess I have some home work to do. >>> >>>It's not clear to me how black will win after 26.Bg2 (I will ask GM Rohde) but >>>it is clear to me there should be an easy winning plan for black as his position >>>is overwhelming. >> >>I don't see an overwhelming position after 26. Bg2. I would think that someone >>or some program could see the win if this was true. I am open to a line to show >>this. > >By head: black gets the white queen for the black rook and bishop. From >there black can create his pawn op b4 into a passed pawn and win. >That's a lot moves away but IMO is the danger. We will see what Michael >has to say. > >Hi, >Is it possible Rebel was trying to avoid a dead equal position after Bg2 and >therefore went in for f4 which in some variations can lead to a better position >for White? The time was up so it evaluated f4 as better? >Kind of "Human like" mistake! No, f4 was just a stupid move, its loss should have been seen quickly. Ed Schroder >regards, >Michael Ginat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.