Author: blass uri
Date: 14:21:54 05/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 1999 at 16:16:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 24, 1999 at 01:36:50, Mark Young wrote: > >>Hiarcs7 thinks and shows it has a clear win playing the other programs and >>against self play. I did not say Hiarcs7 is correct and this is proven. I want >>people to punch holes in the move if they can. If I did not, I would just say >>"White has a overwhelming position and black is lost at move 20". >> > > >I wouldn't call it 'pathetic'. IE why insult GM Rohde. He did win the game, >and all your analysis has shown is that Hiarcs can beat other programs with Bg2, >for example. The team of me and programs tried to win the computer with black after 26.Bg2 without success. I also tried to see a line that leads to black's advantage against the computer after 23.Rxb4 without success. I know that other in this club also tried without success. There is an evidence that 26.Bg2 is leading to a draw and that 23.Rxb4 is leading to white's advantage and I saw no evidence to the opposite. I want to know if it is possible to win hiarcs7 after 26.Bg2 or to do a draw against hiarcs7 after 23.Rxb4. If nobody proves that it is possible then I believe that rebel missed a win by 23.Rxb4 and missed a draw by 26.Bg2 Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.