Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 14:55:42 05/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 1999 at 15:31:59, Francis Monkman wrote: > >On May 23, 1999 at 19:16:42, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>Let's go with Qf1 first. Now 27...Qxb2 28. Bxh3 Ra1 29. Rxb7 Rxf1+ 30.Bxf1 h6 >>31. c5 dc 32.dc Qc3 33.c6 Qxc6 34. Rxb4 and a winning plan for Black is not that >>clear to me.The black king and queen can't simultaneously attack h2, and f2 >>can be defended by the rook, so where is the win? 27...Bxg2 28. Kxg2 Qxb2 >>doesn't appear to lead to anything conclusive for Black. >> >>The situation with Qe1 is different: here, 27...Qxb2 is not possible because of >>Ra5!, so let's try 27...Qxc4 28. Bf1 Bxf1 29. Rxb4 Qd5 30. Qxf1 Kg8 and his >>position is nothing to write home about as long as White does not carelessly >>play 31. Qc4?? >> >>I get the feeling that Black would have much better chances if he wasn't getting >>back-ranked in so many of the subvariations, but seeing how this isn't the case, >>Black's advantage does not appear to be as big as I thought it was. >> >>26...Qd2 might be better than 26...Qc2, but I don't see a trememdous difference. >> >>Dave > >I thought Qf1 Qxb2 won for Black, but you've convinced me that White can >blockade >himself (rook on f3?) and draw, so I'm (reasonably) convinced it's a draw either >way. > >Francis Well, I would still play it out as Black. :-) I would try to creep up all of the pawns and my king and crack White's pawn structure. But at some point I would either need to fork off a piece, or win a pawn outright to win, and I'm just not sure if this can be done or not. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.