Author: Francis Monkman
Date: 03:22:30 05/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 1999 at 02:20:40, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>It's also worth mentioning that chess strategy in the 20th c. has focussed more >>on the dynamics of chess, hidden potential, even 'resonant' and 'unresonant' >>positions. Watching parallel searches, one can often deduce more about the >>dynamics of a position from the relative behaviour of the lines, than from the >>actual move chosen. Current searches obviously reveal information about the >>dynamics of the position, but it seems to be wasted. > >I'm not sure I completely understand what this is saying. Can you try to >clarify a bit for me? Thanks. :) > Happy to, but there's several books'-worth there! Are you asking about 'dynamics of chess positions', or about my observations of parallel-line searches (and the information about dynamics that seems to be registered 'momentarily', but not stored)? Francis
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.