Author: Harald Faber
Date: 05:20:43 05/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 1999 at 06:43:37, Paulo Soares wrote: >>>>>Hiarcs7 thinks and shows it has a clear win playing the other programs and >>>>>against self play. I did not say Hiarcs7 is correct and this is proven. I want >>>>>people to punch holes in the move if they can. If I did not, I would just say >>>>>"White has a overwhelming position and black is lost at move 20". >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>I wouldn't call it 'pathetic'. IE why insult GM Rohde. He did win the game, >>>>and all your analysis has shown is that Hiarcs can beat other programs with Bg2, >>>>for example. >>> >>>The team of me and programs tried to win the computer with black after 26.Bg2 >>>without success. >> >>Does your team contain at least one IM? >> >>>I know that other in this club also tried without success. >> >>Same question. >> >>>If nobody proves that it is possible then I believe that rebel missed a win by >>>23.Rxb4 and missed a draw by 26.Bg2 >>>Uri > >Harald, > >You don't know how strong is a chess player(ELO=1800) aided for a >chess program, analysing a position for some hours. This is my >case. >Paulo Soares, from Brazil Right, I don't know how strong a chess player with ELO1800 is, I just have a guess. I am at 1800DWZ, our best club player has 2000DWZ and an ELO2200. I see a lot in analysis but when this guy starts to play/analyze I am astonished again and again how much more he sees and realizes.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.