Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 22:32:06 05/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 1999 at 06:22:30, Francis Monkman wrote: > >On May 25, 1999 at 02:20:40, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > > >>>It's also worth mentioning that chess strategy in the 20th c. has focussed more >>>on the dynamics of chess, hidden potential, even 'resonant' and 'unresonant' >>>positions. Watching parallel searches, one can often deduce more about the >>>dynamics of a position from the relative behaviour of the lines, than from the >>>actual move chosen. Current searches obviously reveal information about the >>>dynamics of the position, but it seems to be wasted. >> >>I'm not sure I completely understand what this is saying. Can you try to >>clarify a bit for me? Thanks. :) >> > >Happy to, but there's several books'-worth there! Are you asking about 'dynamics >of chess positions', or about my observations of parallel-line searches (and the >information about dynamics that seems to be registered 'momentarily', but not >stored)? > >Francis If there's any way you can sum up: "even 'resonant' and 'unresonant' >>>positions. Watching parallel searches, one can often deduce more about the >>>dynamics of a position from the relative behaviour of the lines, than from the >>>actual move chosen. Current searches obviously reveal information about the >>>dynamics of the position, but it seems to be wasted." without being excessively long. If not, I'll have to try and find this book...:) Jeremiah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.