Author: blass uri
Date: 23:49:52 05/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 1999 at 01:05:37, Jouni Uski wrote: >On May 25, 1999 at 08:30:15, Francis Monkman wrote: > >> >>On May 25, 1999 at 01:05:59, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>You are right. I trusted GM Nunn, when he wrote in original Nunn match Article >>>simply, that after 0-0 Bxh7 is winning. But after >>>Bxh7 Kxh7 >>>Ng5+ Kg6 >>>Qg4 f5 >>>exf6 Kxf6! >>>I don't find any winning line. >>> >>>Jouni >> >>I know GMs are not *always right*, but I'd be sceptical about dismissing Nunn's >>evaluation, especially if one is relying on a program to 'pursue a difficult >>attack'! >> >>I wouldn't claim an 'answer', but I suggest that instead of Qg4, Qd3+ or h4!? >>are >>worth exploring. >> >>Francis > >Yes actually h4 is winning instead of Qg4. LGG2 found it in about 60 seconds. >So Nunn was right (And I also)! > >Jouni Junior5.4's evaluation of the position after 14.h4 is 1.15 pawns advantage for white. Junior5.4 wants to play 14...Qb7 after 14.Qg4 with the idea 15.Qd3+ f5 16.exf6+ Kxf6 17.Qf3+ Nf5 18.Nh7+ Junior4.6 played 14.Qg4 in the 1000 seconds per move nunn match that is probably not the best move. I am not sure if the programs that play 12.Bxh7+ play it for the right reason(14.h4) and I think that it is not so simple to win with 12.Bxh7+ even after 14.h4 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.