Author: Robert Pawlak
Date: 14:26:30 05/26/99
Hello all, I was looking through some of the CAP data using Chess Assistant, and my very quick impression was that the data seemed to indicate that all gambits were bad. Now, do we know the reason for this? Is it that the comps don't understand the positional compensation invovled? Also, weren't different programs used for analysis in the CAP project? If so, how were the scores normalized? Thanks, Bob P.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.