Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 04:14:56 05/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 1999 at 20:30:33, Francis Monkman wrote:
>
>On May 26, 1999 at 16:55:37, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>Crafty 16.7 on a PII 300 was fooled by g4 until ply 10.
>>At two minutes crafty switched to Nc6, at four minutes to Bxd5, and at 6:46 to
>>Bd4:
>>
>
>16.6 definitely stayed on g4 until Ba1 was chosen. Presumably there's a
>performance overhead for running under Win95, and I'm running a 200 MHz machine
>-- but this would suggest 16.7 is significantly different. I look forward to
>trying it...
>
>Francis
Here is what I got with the last modified Crafty I made (from a couple weeks
ago, at least)
2 0.11 -1.20 1. Bd4 Bxg2 2. Kxg2 Nd5
2 0.38 ++ 1. Ned7!!
2 0.64 -0.57 1. Ned7 Qd6 2. Nxf6+ Nxf6 3. Bxf6 Bxf6
2 0.71 -0.53 1. Kg1 Bxg2 2. Qxg2 h6
2 0.76 -0.51 1. Ncd7 Qd6
2 2.27 ++ 1. g4!!
2 2.49 0.09 1. g4 Qd6 2. gxh5
2-> 2.51 0.09 1. g4 Qd6 2. gxh5
3 5.93 -- 1. g4
3 7.42 -0.89 1. g4 Nxf4 2. Qxf4 Rxa2 3. Na6 Rxa6
4. Rd3
3 10.52 -0.81 1. Ned7 Nxd7 2. Nxd7 Qa7 3. Qxa7 Rxa7
4. Bxg7 Kxg7 5. Ne5 Rxa2
3 12.85 ++ 1. Kg1!!
3 13.48 -0.35 1. Kg1 h6 2. Qe3 Bxg2 3. Kxg2
3-> 15.10 -0.35 1. Kg1 h6 2. Qe3 Bxg2 3. Kxg2
4 22.13 -0.30 1. Kg1 Rxa2 2. Rd3 Bxg2 3. Qxg2 Nd5
4. Rc4 Bxe5 5. fxe5
4-> 50.61 -0.30 1. Kg1 Rxa2 2. Rd3 Bxg2 3. Qxg2 Nd5
4. Rc4 Bxe5 5. fxe5
5 1:36 -0.48 1. Kg1 Rxa2 2. Rd2 Rc8 3. Qe3 Bxg2
4. Rxg2 Qd6
5 9:41 -0.24 1. Bd4 Bxg2 2. Kxg2 Nd5 3. Ncd7 Qb5
4. Kg1
5-> 10:25 -0.24 1. Bd4 Bxg2 2. Kxg2 Nd5 3. Ncd7 Qb5
4. Kg1
6 17:42 -0.22 1. Bd4 Bxg2 2. Qxg2 Qb5 3. Kg1 h6 4.
a4 bxa3 5. Rc4
6-> 48:27 -0.22 1. Bd4 Bxg2 2. Qxg2 Qb5 3. Kg1 h6 4.
a4 bxa3 5. Rc4
This version went *WAY* overboard with capture extensions, which is why it gets
such low depth. The only consolation is that it seems to see tactical loss
rather quickly. :P
Jeremiah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.