Author: blass uri
Date: 05:18:59 05/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 1999 at 05:42:28, Harald Faber wrote: >On May 25, 1999 at 19:27:00, Paulo Soares wrote: > >>>Right, I don't know how strong a chess player with ELO1800 is, I just have a >>>guess. I am at 1800DWZ, our best club player has 2000DWZ and an ELO2200. >>>I see a lot in analysis but when this guy starts to play/analyze I am astonished >>>again and again how much more he sees and realizes. >> >>Harald, >> >>It makes the following experience: ask for somebody to choose 5 >>positions, of preference closed, and tries to make the analysis of >>those positions with the aid of some program of which you likes, for >>one hour. After that ask for the best player of his club making the >>analysis of the same positions, in the same time, without using a >>program. I bet with you a beer(man talk that Germany beer is >>excellent), as his analyses will be very better. >>Paulo Soares > >What do you bet? That the program's analysis is better? >Then I can say you already lost, I did it with OPEN (!) positions, see the game >Gambitsoft-Forum vs IM Hans Klarenbeek, game still to go on. >HUMANS (in my club) came up with GOOD, JUSTIFIED and REASONABLE move suggestions >and IDEAS. Programs only had stupid move suggestions (or even worse ideas), e.g. >16.Nf5 and 16.g5 were suggested. 16.g5 might have been a considerable move but >16.Nf5 is not. I think that he does not say that the program's analysis is better but that the analysis of the team of human with 1800 rating + program is better. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.