Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 04:18:38 05/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 1999 at 02:48:23, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>On May 27, 1999 at 20:30:32, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On May 27, 1999 at 13:36:03, Eugene Nalimov wrote:
>>
>>>On May 27, 1999 at 08:07:46, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 27, 1999 at 07:32:02, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On May 27, 1999 at 07:19:17, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On May 27, 1999 at 07:04:14, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On May 26, 1999 at 19:14:14, Michel Chassey wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 8 | | | | | | | | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 7 | *K| | | | | | | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 6 | | | | *P| | | | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 5 | *P| | | P | | *P| | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 4 | P | | | P | | P | | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 3 | | | | | | | | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 2 | | | | | | | | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> 1 | | K | | | | | | |
>>> +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
>>> a b c d e f g h
>>
>>
>>Thanks Eugene... so the executable seems to be ok. Now I wonder what caused
>>this problem in the first place...
>
>Looks like the executables from Bob Hyatt's site are ok.
>the problem occurs with my own executable.
>
>I use
>Optimierender Microsoft (R) 32-Bit C/C++-Compiler, Version 12.00.8168, fuer x86
>CFLAGS = /O2 /G6 /Gr /Ob2
>COPTS = /MT /DSMP /DCPUS=2 /DFAST
>and do a "nmake wcraftyx"
>
>and still get the problem.
>
> (2) 23 55.62 1.05 1. Kb2 Ka8 2. Kc2 Kb8 3. Kd2 Kc8 4.
> Kd3 Kc7 5. Ke3 Kd7 6. Kf2 Ke7 7. Ke1
> Kd7 8. Kd1 Kc7 9. Ke2 Kd7 10. Kf3 Ke7
> 11. Kf2 Kd7 12. Ke3
> 23-> 1:45 1.05 1. Kb2 Ka8 2. Kc2 Kb8 3. Kd2 Kc8 4.
> Kd3 Kc7 5. Ke3 Kd7 6. Kf2 Ke7 7. Ke1
> Kd7 8. Kd1 Kc7 9. Ke2 Kd7 10. Kf3 Ke7
> 11. Kf2 Kd7 12. Ke3
> (3) 24 1:45 1.05 1. Kb2 Ka8 2. Kc2 Kb8 3. Kd2 Kc8 4.
> Kd3 Kc7 5. Ke3 Kd7 6. Kf2 Ke7 7. Ke1
> Kd7 8. Kf1 Ke7 9. Kf2 Ke8 10. Ke2 Kd7
> 11. Kf3 Ke7 12. Ke3 Kd7
> time=5:00 cpu=200% mat=1 n=90832482 fh=96% nps=302381
> ext-> checks=21673 recaps=0 pawns=182451 1rep=2 thrt:0
> predicted=0 nodes=90832482 evals=1096106
> endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0
> SMP-> split=3258 stop=215 data=11/64 cpu=10:01 elap=5:00
>
>White(1): Kb2
> time used: 5:00
>
>May be my compiler has a problem?
>Any help is apreciated.
>
>Kind regards
>Bernhard
Well, with mt=1 I get similar results as Eugene. But with mt=2 I get a poor
result compared with crafty16.6.
Here my inputfile
computer
ponder off
swindle off
book off
hash 12M
hashp 4M
mt 1
noise 9999
time cpu
sd 25
st 300
setboard 8/k7/3p/p2P1p/P2P1P///K w
d
go
end
And here the output:
(3) 21 5.79 1.07 1. Kb2 Ka8 2. Kc2 Kb8 3. Kd2 Kc8 4.
Ke2 Kd7 5. Kd1 Ke7 6. Kc1 Kf6 7. Kd2
Kf7 8. Ke3 Kg6 9. Kd3 Kh5 10. Ke2 Kg4
11. Ke3
21-> 13.27 1.07 1. Kb2 Ka8 2. Kc2 Kb8 3. Kd2 Kc8 4.
Ke2 Kd7 5. Kd1 Ke7 6. Kc1 Kf6 7. Kd2
Kf7 8. Ke3 Kg6 9. Kd3 Kh5 10. Ke2 Kg4
11. Ke3
(3) 22 14.21 1.07 1. Kb2 Ka8 2. Kc2 Kb8 3. Kd2 Kc8 4.
Kc1 Kb7 5. Kb1 Ka7 6. Ka2 Kb8 7. Kb3
Kc7 8. Kc4 Kb6 9. Kd3 Kc7 10. Kc3 Kb7
11. Kc4 Kb6
22 1:15 ++ 1. Kb1!!
22-> 1:17 1.46 1. Kb1
23 2:03 ++ 1. Kb1!!
(2) 23 2:31 2.89 1. Kb1 Kb8 2. Kc2 Kc8 3. Kd2 Kd8 4.
Kc3 Kc7 5. Kd3 Kb6 6. Ke2 Ka6 7. Ke3
Kb7 8. Kf3 Kb6 9. Kg3 Kb7 10. Kh4 Kc8
11. Kg5 Kd7 12. Kxf5
23-> 2:31 2.89 1. Kb1 Kb8 2. Kc2 Kc8 3. Kd2 Kd8 4.
Kc3 Kc7 5. Kd3 Kb6 6. Ke2 Ka6 7. Ke3
Kb7 8. Kf3 Kb6 9. Kg3 Kb7 10. Kh4 Kc8
11. Kg5 Kd7 12. Kxf5
24 2:42 2.89 1. Kb1 Kb8 2. Kc2 Kc8 3. Kd2 Kd8 4.
Kc3 Kc7 5. Kd3 Kb6 6. Ke2 Ka6 7. Ke3
Kb7 8. Kf3 Kb6 9. Kg3 Kc7 10. Kh4 Kd7
11. Kg5 Kd8 12. Kxf5 Kd7
24-> 2:43 2.89 1. Kb1 Kb8 2. Kc2 Kc8 3. Kd2 Kd8 4.
Kc3 Kc7 5. Kd3 Kb6 6. Ke2 Ka6 7. Ke3
Kb7 8. Kf3 Kb6 9. Kg3 Kc7 10. Kh4 Kd7
11. Kg5 Kd8 12. Kxf5 Kd7
25 2:54 2.89 1. Kb1 Kb8 2. Kc2 Kc8 3. Kd2 Kd8 4.
Kc3 Kc7 5. Kd3 Kb6 6. Ke2 Kc7 7. Kf3
Kd7 8. Kg3 Ke7 9. Kh4 Kf6 10. Kh5 Ke7
11. Kg6 Ke8 12. Kxf5 Kd7 13. Ke4
25-> 2:55 2.89 1. Kb1 Kb8 2. Kc2 Kc8 3. Kd2 Kd8 4.
Kc3 Kc7 5. Kd3 Kb6 6. Ke2 Kc7 7. Kf3
Kd7 8. Kg3 Ke7 9. Kh4 Kf6 10. Kh5 Ke7
11. Kg6 Ke8 12. Kxf5 Kd7 13. Ke4
time=2:55 cpu=199% mat=1 n=47500484 fh=88% nps=270288
ext-> checks=49578 recaps=0 pawns=146 1rep=0 thrt:0
predicted=0 nodes=47500484 evals=11647417
endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0
SMP-> split=6040 stop=475 data=12/64 cpu=5:51 elap=2:55
White(1): Kb1
time used: 2:55
Black(1): execution complete.
I think 75 sec to find Kb1! on a 2 proc PPro 223 MHz is too long.
Kind regards
Bernhard
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.