Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nimzo99 MMX - Hiarcs 6 P90 SSDF game 12/20 1-0 Now: 10 - 2

Author: Melvin S. Schwartz

Date: 17:20:34 05/29/99

Go up one level in this thread



On May 29, 1999 at 18:36:39, James Robertson wrote:

>On May 29, 1999 at 10:09:02, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:
>
>>
>>I don't understand how you can seriously give credence to this match when you
>>are running Nimzo on superior hardware. The advantage of Nimzo on a Pentium 200
>>MMX is not to be taken lightly. Regardless, Hiarcs 6 is outdated by Hiarcs 7 and
>>the Hash tables in Hiarcs 7 is much higher than what you listed for Hiarcs 6. My
>>main point is that when testing chess programs, you should test them on the SAME
>>type of computer.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mel
>
>You keep saying throughout this thread that matches with both programs playing
>on the same hardware are superior. Why
>
>James

Is it really that difficult to understand? If you are going to compare A against
B, don't you think they should BOTH be on the same playing field?? It is a
reality that the speed, amount of RAM, and even the processor of a computer can
affect the performance of the software program. The speed of a computer is very
important!

Regards,
Mel



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.