Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 09:21:41 05/31/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 1999 at 11:08:43, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >On May 31, 1999 at 02:05:07, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: > >>On May 30, 1999 at 16:18:32, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >> >>>The fact I used the wrong author does not change my position on this issue. In >>>fact, I don't agree that the question is not "what is the strongest program'? >>>After all, when people look at ratings, reviews, etc., what do you think they >>>want to know? I believe people want to know WHAT IS THE STRONGEST PROGRAM. The >>>ONLY way to make a proper judgement on that issue is to compare A against B on >>>equal hardware. For your information, the author of the post to which I first >>>responded - Hiarcs vs. Nimzo - said I was CORRECT in what I said about comparing >>>programs with equal hardware. The problem is as was stated by him was that they >>>haven't the resources to do it that way! Not that I was wrong!!! >> >>It´s not only about resources. When we started to play on P200MMX we had to play >>against programs which had a know rating on P90, to get a rating for the >>programs on P200MMX!!! >> >>So, you are wrong. >>And now we are starting to play on K6-2 450 Mhz 128MB - Those programs >>we have to play against programs on P200MMX etc. until they have a rating >>on K6-2. >>Then we can start playing K6-2 against K6-2 >> >>Venlig hilsen >> >>Hans Christian Lykke >> >So who is Timothy J. Frolick who posted a response to me that I was correct and >then went on about SSDF testing? He appeared to be associated with the SSDF >testing. Is he? >Mel> No, but Mr. Lykke is. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.