Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Mel: you misquoted Dr. Hyatt.

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:02:10 06/01/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 01, 1999 at 13:40:26, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:
[snip]
>Hello Dann!
>
>I probably should just set-up Hiarcs, Fritz, or Rebel and take away their Queen
>before the first move and have some fun instead of prolonging this topic;
>however, I am a person who when having strong opinions feels he must express
>them even when he knows nothing about what he's talking. :-)
There is nothing wrong with feeling passionate about things.  It is just that
you may not necessarily be correct, despite the strong feelings.

>If the SSDF could test all the programs against each other on the identical
>computer, don't you think they would consider that a more accurate way to get
>ratings than what they are doing now?
They would be less accurate, and possibly useless.  For instance, if I get two
1GHz CPU and put Hiarcs7.32 and Fritz 5.32 on them and let them rage against
each other, believe it or not, I will have no mathematical results at all from
the contest!  That is because neither one of them has a measured strength. The
objective of the SSDF is to provide a true ability rating that is mathematically
sound. While there are always great difficulties associated with a thing like
this and there are going to be problems, it is essential that the tests
conducted be performed with opponents of known strength.  The better and more
accurately you know the strength of an opponent, the better and more accurately
you will know the strength of the new configuration.  The way to determine the
strenght of an opponent (human or computer) is a mathematical formula that uses
the strength of the opponent as one of its arguments.  If this number is "iffy"
(+/- one standard deviation is a large number) then the quality of the
mathematical answer to that equation is also bad.  Therefore, the more tests you
have with a particular system and program combination, the more valuable it
becomes for determining the strength of the opponents.

Does it become more clear now?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.