Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 11:59:01 06/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 01, 1999 at 10:04:44, blass uri wrote: > >On June 01, 1999 at 08:59:46, Andrew Dados wrote: > >> It's interesting to see how many people here oppose SSDF testing because of >>speed advantage, say 3 times, between hardware (P90 vs P200) leading to match >>scores like 14:4 (more or less - threads on subject emerge regularly) and yet >>refuse to estimate thousandfold speed difference impact 'correctly'.... Common >>sense can be misleading... > >This speed advantage leads to difference of less than 100 elo and 14:4 is >difference of more than 200 elo. > >The expected result between p200 and p90 is not 14:4 but something like >11:7 or 10.5:7.5 > >We cannot learn from these results to estimate thousandfold speed difference >impact 'correctly' because the difference in rating may go down. I say we break out the 386s and do some autoplaying with them against K2-450 :-) It would be funny to see how quickly one program could crush the other. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.