Author: James Robertson
Date: 19:19:30 06/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On May 31, 1999 at 19:35:53, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On May 31, 1999 at 19:13:56, James Robertson wrote: > >>On May 31, 1999 at 12:01:38, Tony Hedlund wrote: >> >>> >>>Sicilian-Dragon(B72). >>> >>>[Event "Tony Hedlund"] >>>[Site "Lulea"] >>>[Date "1999.05.29"] >>>[Round "20"] >>>[White "MCP6 P90"] >>>[Black "CM6000 P200"] >>>[Result "0-1"] >>>[ECO "B72"] >>>[WhiteElo "2416"] >>>[BlackElo "2576"] >>>[BlackClock "1580"] >>>[TimeControl "40/7200:40/7200:40/7200"] >>>[WhiteClock "2014"] >>> >>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O >>>8. Qd2 d5 9. e5 Ne8 10. f4 f6 11. O-O-O fxe5 12. fxe5 Nc6 13. Nf3 Bg4 14. >>>Nxd5 e6 15. Nf6+ Nxf6 16. Qxd8 Raxd8 17. Rxd8 Rxd8 18. exf6 Bxf6 19. Bc4 >>>Bf5 20. c3 Ne5 21. Nxe5 Bxe5 22. h3 h5 23. Re1 Bb8 24. Bg5 Re8 25. Rd1 >>>Bg3 26. Rd4 Rf8 27. Be3 a6 28. Bb3 Rf7 29. Bg5 Rc7 30. Kd2 Be5 31. Rh4 >>>Rd7+ 32. Kc1 Bg3 33. Rd4 Rxd4 34. cxd4 Kf7 35. d5 b5 36. a3 e5 37. Kd1 >>>Bf4 38. Bh4 Ke8 39. Be1 Be3 40. Bc3 Bd4 41. Ke2 Be4 42. g4 hxg4 43. hxg4 >>>Kd7 44. Bb4 Bxb2 45. a4 Bc1 46. Bc5 Bf4 47. axb5 axb5 48. Ba3 Bb1 49. Bc5 >>>e4 50. Kd1 Bd3 51. Bc2 Bd6 52. Be3 Bxc2+ 53. Kxc2 Bf8 54. Bf4 Bc5 55. Bg3 >>>b4 56. Kb3 g5 57. Kc4 e3 58. Be5 Bd6 59. Bd4 Bf4 60. Kxb4 e2 61. Bc3 Bg3 >>>62. Kc4 e1=Q 63. Bxe1 Bxe1 64. Kd3 Ke7 65. Kd4 Kf6 66. Ke4 Ba5 67. d6 Ke6 >>>68. d7 Bc7 69. Kd4 Kxd7 70. Kd5 Bg3 71. Ke4 Ke6 72. Kf3 0-1 >>> >>>Tony >> >>A few posts down Hans Christian Lykke posted a message about MChess 8 on a P200 >>playing CM6k for the SSDF. Is it really true that MChess 6 on a P90 is rated >>2416 and MChess 8 on a P200 is only rated 2481, a difference of just 65 points? >> >>James >Hallo! > >McPro7 seems to be 20-30 points better then McPro8.Such things happens from time >to time in example Fritz4 was weaker then Fritz3. Hiarcs3 and Hiarcs4 almost >identical and Genius3-4-5 plays at almost the same strength. Rebel8 and Rebel9 >maybe 10 points stronger, Nimzo3 and Nimzo3.5 equally strong. The problem is >that you have to play several houndred games to be sure if a new program is >better then it´s predecessor (if they are close) > >Regards Bertil SSDF Hmm. I'll bet things like this will not improve sales! James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.