Author: blass uri
Date: 07:30:20 06/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 1999 at 09:55:05, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >On June 02, 1999 at 03:07:04, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Sorry for spelling error Hiarcs7.32 = 2590 of course! > >Still I think it is to much. Doubling the clock could rise 20-30 points but an >increase of 25% in speed is much less than a single ply in the tree. How can >that change much? 1)Doubling the speed can rise more than 20-30 points based on the ssdf results. The difference between pentium200 and pentium90 is clearly more than 50 points and if the difference was only 20-30 then we could expect a difference of less than 50. 2)Hiarcs7.32 is using nalimov tablebases when hiarcs7 does not use them. 3)The real Hiarcs7 is better than the ssdf Hiarcs7 because the ssdf Hiarcs7 cannot win in KBN vs K. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.