Author: Phil Dixon
Date: 03:59:17 06/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 1999 at 02:20:27, blass uri wrote: > >On June 03, 1999 at 01:38:54, Tania Devora wrote: > >> >>Pentium II 450 Mhz - 128 ram. >> >>50 points more ?? Mmmmmhhh, Fritz5.32 have 2577 elo in SSdf, and 50 points >>more for fritz5.32, about 2627 elo. >> >>Wow ! Top programs are really good. >> >>What do you think Uri ? > >I think that it is ssdf rating and it does not prove that it is fide rating. > >I also expect other programs like chessmaster to get more from the new hardware. > 1...Qxf3+ [Fritz 5.32: 1...Qc7 2.Nc4 Bxc4 3.bxc4 Qxc4 4.Qe4 Qc3 5.Qh7+ Kf8 6.Qd3; Fritz 5.32: 1...Qc8 2.Nc4 Bxc4 3.bxc4 Qxc4] 2.Kxf3 d3 3.Bb1 Ba5 4.Ke3 Bb6+ 5.Ke4 Bc5 6.e6 Line Fritz 5.32 reads it absolutely = at 14 ply on my 233 w/26Megs of RAM Phil >I know that other programs earn more speed from better hardware when Fritz5.32 >is optimized to p200. > >I read that Fritz5.32 earns only 96% in speed and is less than twice faster when >Junior5 and Hiarcs7 can earn more and are more then twice faster. > >I also do not like the fact that all the versions of Fritz are root processors >and the evaluation is based on the root. > >I think that Fritz5.32 lost a game against Hiarcs7 in the ssdf games because of >this reason. >It traded queens and only after trading queens it saw that it was wrong and not >because of the fact that it could see more. > >3b2k1/1q3pp1/7p/1b2P3/3p1PP1/1P3Q1P/2BN2K1/8 b - - 0 1 > >In this position from game 6786 of the ssdf games Fritz5.32 played the blunder >38...Qxf3+ and only after trading queens it understod that it was a wrong >decision. > >I am interested to know if Fritz5.32 can avoid this blunder on a better >hardware. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.