Author: blass uri
Date: 01:32:04 06/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 1999 at 02:19:42, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On June 05, 1999 at 01:59:54, Tania Devora wrote: > >> >> >>A poor result for fritz5.32. why ? > >I assume you played it on one computer. I do not know enough about Fritz and >Hiarcs if you play them on one computer maybe one will be worse off. > >I know CM6K loves to eat all CPU power, so there would be a disadvantage there. The difference is that Hiarcs7.32 is an engine for Fritz(both program are sold by chessbase so chessbase should care that in engine-engine games it will not happen. I do not know about the case of Hiarcs7.32 but from my experience from engine-engine matches[Junior against crafty or Fritz5(16 bit)] there is no problem of eating CPU. It is possible that the fact that the sides could not use the permanent brain gave advantage fo Hiarcs7.32 because hiarcs7.32 does not clear the hash tables after every move and the fact that it remember information from previous search may be more significant without permanent brain. It is also possible that the Hiarcs7.32 was lucky. In computer games sometimes there are results of 8:2 between equal opponents because one player was unlucky to choose openings that it does not understand. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.